John Acton’s Early Life and Move to London: John Acton was born 23 March 1833 in Birmingham, Warwickshire, and baptized a week later at St. Martin’s Church. He was the son of Thomas Acton (a brickmaker from Lichfield) and his wife Sarah Harper Newman of Abbots Bromley, Staffordshire. Like many working-class sons of early industrial England, John learned a trade – in his case bricklaying – and migrated to London for work during the mid-19th century construction boom. By 1861 he was recorded in London as a 28-year-old bricklayer living in Chelsea (St. George Hanover Square district) as he established himself in the building trade.
Coleridge Buildings on Archway Road
In the late 1860s, John Acton and his young family settled in Highgate, North London. The 1871 Census shows John (listed as age ~34) living at Coleridge Buildings, Archway Road, Highgate – a new block of model dwellings – with his wife “Harrell” Acton (age 32, likely a misrecording of Harriet Acton) and their two sons, George (5) and John Jr. (3). John’s occupation was given as bricklayer, reflecting a stable skilled trade he pursued for decades. Coleridge Buildings were a notable address: this large tenement block on the corner of Archway Road and Shepherd’s Hill had just opened in May 1867, built by the Highgate Dwellings Improvement Company as “model workers’ flats” for “the artisans and labourers of Highgate”. The block contained 47 apartments of two or three rooms each, intended as improved working-class housing as part of an initiative to “improve the Crown of Highgate Hill”.
Living Conditions in 1871
Life in Coleridge Buildings was dense urban living, but for its time a step up from the “miserable hovels” it replaced. The flats had a “rationalised quota of rooms” (2-3 per unit) and modern conveniences for the era. Nevertheless, they soon drew complaints from Hornsey’s Medical Officer – inspections in the 1870s found defective sink traps, leaky soil pipes and inadequate sewer connections. These issues indicate the sanitary challenges even in “improved” housing. Residents like the Actons would have relied on communal outhouses and basic plumbing that frequently malfunctioned. Despite that, Coleridge Buildings represented early affordable housing – “Highgate’s answer to Peabody buildings,” as one local historian quipped. The Actons likely paid modest rent for their flat and lived among dozens of other tradesmen’s families (an 1873 directory notes “about 46 families of artisans lived in the Archway Road flats”). Children from the building could attend a small National (Church of England) infants’ school actually located within Coleridge Buildings. (A Miss Florence Shepherd is listed in 1870s records as the infants’ mistress at Coleridge Buildings.) The Actons’ elder son George, at 5, may well have started his schooling in this very building’s classroom. The family’s parish church was likely St. Anne’s, Highgate, a new church on Highgate Rise catering to that growing neighborhood, or they might have attended nearby St. Michael’s on Highgate Hill. At the foot of Archway Road stood the Archway Tavern and the imposing Highgate Archway, under which horse-drawn trams rumbled every few minutes by 1871. Thus the Actons in 1871 lived in a buzzing urban locale: a working-class tenement block perched on the newly developed Archway Road, with a railway station, tram line, and shops nearby, offering both opportunities and the gritty realities of city life in Victorian London.
Relocation to Fulham/Kensington by 1881
Move to West London: Sometime in the 1870s, John and Harriet Acton left Highgate and moved their family to West London. By the time of the 1881 Census, they were residing at 16 Munster Road in Fulham, on the western outskirts of Kensington district. John, now 48, was still listed as a bricklayer, and the census shows him living with wife Harriet and their children at that address. (The 1881 entry confirms Harriet’s name, correcting the earlier “Harrell”.) This move roughly a decade after Highgate may have been motivated by work: the late 1870s were a period of rapid housing development in Fulham, providing plenty of employment for builders. Indeed, Fulham’s population was booming – the area was transforming from semi-rural market gardens to dense rows of new terraces. Entire estates were built practically overnight: for example, in the 1880s the developers Gibbs & Flew put up some 1,200 houses on former gardens in North End Fulham (though an economic slump left many unsold). Such frenetic growth meant constant demand for bricklayers and builders, which likely drew John Acton to the area.
Munster Road, Fulham
The Actons’ new home at 16 Munster Rd was a typical Victorian terraced house on a long residential street. Munster Road runs through Walham Green/Parsons Green in Fulham – an area that in the 1870s–80s filled up with respectable artisans’ dwellings and a few middle-class “villas.” The houses on Munster Road were brick-built terraces, two or three stories tall, often with bay windows and small front gardens (some known as “Lion Houses” on nearby Peterborough Estate, each topped with a stone lion ornament – a hallmark of Fulham’s late-Victorian homes). No. 16 would have been one of a continuous row of such houses. By 1881, the Acton household included their sons now in adolescence (George about 15, John Jr. about 13), and possibly additional younger children born in the 1870s (census data suggests the Actons had more than two children, though details aren’t given in the excerpt). These children likely attended local Fulham schools or found work in their teens. For instance, a boy of 15 in 1881 might have started an apprenticeship or worked as a junior clerk or errand-runner; a 13-year-old might still be at school or already employed part-time, as education beyond age 12 was not yet compulsory.
Fulham’s streets in the 1880s were lined with newly built red-brick houses for artisans and clerks, reflecting the suburb’s rapid development. Many houses in this district were built in the 1870s, as Fulham transitioned from rural market gardens to a populated London suburb.
Neighbourhood and Conditions in the 1880s
Fulham in the late 19th century was a patchwork of working-class and lower-middle-class communities. Charles Booth’s famous social survey a decade later (1898–99) classified most of Munster Road’s neighborhood as “mixed: some comfortable, others poor”, indicating artisans like John Acton lived alongside both fairly decent small traders and some poorer labourers. The Actons were likely neither destitute nor especially prosperous – John’s steady employment as a bricklayer (and later a builder/foreman) provided a reliable if modest income. The family would have had better accommodations than in Highgate: instead of a flat in a tenement block, they occupied an entire small house (renting it). This meant more space (separate bedrooms, a parlour, maybe a tiny backyard) and improved sanitation – by the 1880s most Fulham houses had flushing WCs or at least better drains, and mains water was available. Nevertheless, Fulham was not immune to urban problems. Overcrowding and poverty existed in pockets (especially nearer the river and the industrial zones of Sands End). But Walham/Parsons Green was relatively respectable. The Actons’ daily life would have been set against the backdrop of a rapidly urbanizing Fulham: new churches (e.g. St. John’s at Walham Green and others) to serve the growing flock, new transport links (the District Railway’s extension opened nearby in 1880s, and horse-drawn omnibuses ran along Fulham Road), and civic amenities coming in. In 1888, Fulham gained its own local government (becoming part of the Metropolitan Borough of Fulham a few years later), and rate books and electoral rolls from the late 1880s likely list John Acton as a voter residing on Munster Road after the expansion of suffrage (by 1885 most male householders in boroughs like Fulham could vote). We don’t have the specific electoral register entry in this research, but his presence in Fulham directories or voting lists would not be surprising given his stable address. Local parish records (All Saints Church, Fulham’s historic parish, or the nearer St. Dionis, Parsons Green, founded 1876) might also show the Actons in baptisms or community events, though specific mentions weren’t found in the sources.
Later Years and John Acton’s Death (1894)
Stability and Family Changes: John Acton appears to have continued working in the building trade into the 1890s. Across the 1861, 1871, and 1881 censuses he is “consistently a tradesman, with a stable occupation across decades”. In other words, he did not veer into other professions – he likely went from being a journeyman bricklayer to a more senior role. By his later years, he may well have described himself as a “builder” (perhaps taking on small contracts or employing a few men), reflecting modest upward mobility from manual laborer toward contractor. The thriving construction market in Fulham/Kensington in the 1880s–90s would have provided ample opportunity for an experienced bricklayer to become a foreman or small builder. His sons, coming of age in the 1880s, might have followed him into the building trades or sought other employment in London. (Many sons often apprenticed under their father’s trade; if so, George or John Jr. could have become bricklayers or carpenters. Alternatively, they may have taken jobs in the myriad industries and offices of Victorian London – without specific records, we can only speculate.)
1891 Census and Residence
In the 1891 census, John (around 58) and Harriet (around 52) were likely still in the Fulham/Kensington area. Although the detailed entry wasn’t quoted in our sources, John Acton likely appears in the 1891 census of Fulham as a householder, possibly still on Munster Road or a nearby street. It’s possible the family moved to a different house in Fulham in the 1880s, but they remained within the same borough. (One secondary source actually mis-placed John in Fulham already in 1871, suggesting that by 1891 he was certainly in Fulham.) We do know “John Acton lived out the rest of his life in Fulham”, indicating no further long-distance moves. In 1891 his household may have shrunk as the older boys were in their 20s – they might have moved out or married by then, leaving John and Harriet perhaps with any younger children still at home. The Fulham area in the 1890s continued to grow in population; socially, it was a mix of working-class terraces and a few affluent enclaves. The Actons would have been typical residents – part of the solid, respectable working class. They witnessed improvements like electric trams starting to replace horse buses and the arrival of new public amenities (Fulham got a public library in 1894, for example).
John Acton’s Death
In January 1894, John Acton died in Fulham at the age of 60. His death was registered in the Fulham civil registration district in the first quarter of 1894. He had spent over three decades in London, from his 20s to 60, and died in the same borough “where he had worked for decades”. This suggests he achieved a measure of stability and rootedness – quite an outcome for someone born in Birmingham who came to the metropolis seeking opportunity. Contemporary records (such as a death certificate or burial register) would likely list his occupation at death as “builder” or “bricklayer (foreman)”. John may have been buried in one of the local cemeteries – possibly Fulham Palace Road Cemetery (opened 1865) or Margravine Cemetery (Hammersmith) – or in a churchyard if space permitted. We did not find a specific burial record in the connected sources, but given the family’s residence, Fulham Cemetery (on Fulham Palace Road) is a strong possibility; it had expanded in 1874 with a new entrance on Munster Road, not far from the Actons’ home. It’s poignant to note that the improvement in living conditions from Highgate to Fulham may have contributed to longevity – reaching age 60 was respectable for a working man of that era.
Aftermath – Family Legacy
Harriet Acton, John’s widow, survived him (we don’t have her death date here, but she likely appears as a widow in the 1901 census in her 60s if still living). The Acton children presumably continued to live in London. For instance, George Acton would have been about 28 at his father’s death – possibly married with his own household by the 1890s. John Jr. would have been mid-20s. Without specific records, their fates are unknown in this research, but they were part of the generation of London-born children of provincial immigrants, perhaps benefiting from better education and job options in booming late-Victorian London.
Meanwhile, Coleridge Buildings in Highgate carried on housing working families up until World War II. The block that John and Harriet once called home in 1871 met a violent end in 1944, when a German V-1 flying bomb struck it, demolishing the century-old tenements. After the war, the site was cleared and eventually Goldsmith Court was built in 1950, a small block of flats for elderly residents. Highgate itself changed from a semi-rural village to a London suburb with conservation areas, and today nothing physical remains of the Coleridge Buildings except a small garden. In Fulham, the streets where John Acton spent his final years also evolved – by the 1890s Fulham was fully urban, and in the 20th century it became an integral part of inner London. The terraced houses on Munster Road survived the wartime Blitz and many are still in use today (often highly priced now, in a twist of fate).
Community and Historical Context
John Acton’s story – “from brickmaker’s son to builder in Victorian London” – is one small example of the wider social mobility and urban migration of the 19th century. Born to a brickmaker in the Midlands, he moved to the capital, raised a family, and climbed from a tenant in a model dwelling in Highgate to a householder in Fulham. The areas he lived in illustrate the changing face of London: Highgate’s “model dwellings” were an early experiment in social housing amid a mid-Victorian housing crisis, while Fulham’s development was part of the late-Victorian suburban expansion fueled by railways and economic growth. The Acton family’s life would have been shaped by these neighborhood dynamics – from the communal laundries and close quarters at Coleridge Buildings to the relative privacy of a Fulham terrace; from the steep hills and fresh air of Highgate (on the Northern Heights) to the flat, clay soil of the Thames-side parish of Fulham (once known for being “Fulham mire” or “foul mud” in Saxon times, but by 1890 thoroughly built over). Each locale had its local institutions: in Highgate, perhaps the children were baptized at St. Michael’s or St. Anne’s, and attended the Coleridge Buildings infants school; in Fulham, the family would have been part of All Saints’ parish or one of the new churches, and the children might have gone to a nearby board school (the Fulham area had several by the 1880s).
In summary, the Acton family’s trajectory can be traced through the surviving records and historical context: John Acton – born in Birmingham 1833 – appears in Highgate in 1871 as a young father and bricklayer at Coleridge Buildings, an address emblematic of Victorian social housing efforts. A decade later, he is established in Fulham as a householder on Munster Road, still in the same trade. He likely saw his sons begin careers of their own during the 1880s. Finally, in January 1894 John passed away after some 60 years of life shaped by the profound urban and social changes of the 19th century. His story is interwoven with the history of the neighborhoods he lived in – from the model flats of Archway Road to the red-brick terraces of Fulham – bringing to life the conditions, challenges, and community developments of London in the 1870s–1890s.
Sources: The above narrative is drawn from a variety of records and historical sources, including UK census entries (1871, 1881) for John Acton’s household, local history publications, and maps. Details on Coleridge Buildings and Highgate were obtained from Highgate community histories and directories, while information on Fulham’s development and the Actons’ later life comes from Fulham historical society research and genealogical data. These sources collectively paint a comprehensive picture of the Acton family’s life and times in Victorian London.l
Leave a Reply